告别自由贸易乌托邦，交互参与全球化3.0

2025年4月2日，美国总统川普站在白宫玫瑰园，向全世界宣布这一天为“解放日”。他称这一宣布为“美国历史上最重要的日子之一”，也是一份“美国的经济独立宣言”。这一天，全球化2.0的“自由贸易乌托邦”正式走向终结，全球化3.0以“交互主体共生”的新文明逻辑悄然登场——一种基于共生经济学（Symbionomics）的解释。

川普以“对等关税”（Reciprocal Tariffs）取代虚伪的“自由贸易”，以一一对谈的方式重构关税、制度、主权与文明关系，逐步实现“零关税、零壁垒、零歧视”的三零规则。这不仅是一个经济政策的转变，更是一场哲学和文明的重构——从主客对立的支配逻辑，走向主体间性觉知与对等交互共生的新秩序。

全球化3.0的到来，不是对全球化的破坏，而是全球化2.0走到尽头的文明必然。它向世人昭示：唯有主体间性觉知与对等交互共生，才能走出“结构互害”的全球困局；唯有哲学3.0的觉醒，才能为全球化3.0点燃底层之光，承载交互、融合差异，生成和涌现以文明重构为核心的全球化新篇章。

全球化3.0以“零关税、零壁垒、零歧视”的三零规则为目标，摒弃“输血型分工”（谁带动谁），转向主体间结构对等与责任互嵌的协作机制。“零歧视”不仅意味着“零补贴”，更要求贸易行为实现主体间一一对应、动态交互、公正博弈——不以特权代表他人，不以意识形态排斥他者，不以既得利益取代公平起点。

共生经济学（Symbionomics）为这一新文明逻辑提供了理论基础。共生经济学提出“健康黄金律”（Golden Rule of Health）和“五因交互模型”（C/E/H/T/P），认为全球互动必须平衡五个维度：降本（C，Cost Reduction）、赋能（E，Empowerment）、健康（H，Health）、信托结构（T，Trust Structure）、和平（P，Peace）。通过健康值（Health Value, HV）公式：HV = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P / STC（社会交易成本，Social Transaction Cost），可以评估全球系统的共生健康度。一个健康的全球系统需确保HV大于1，满足成本低、幸福高、效率高且符合共生法则的原则。在全球化3.0中，共生经济学指导贸易和经济关系的重构，确保国家与主体间实现对等、平衡的交互，减少社会交易成本（如官僚主义、不透明），并最大化健康与和平的乘积效应。

这一新秩序的实现，摒弃了WTO“一签全包”的协议政治。WTO模式下，只要美国政客被说服，整个体系便默认“成员普适性”，完全不顾各国是否准备好承担对等责任，导致系统性互害。全球化3.0通过一对一谈判，以“对等关税”施加结构压力，倒逼各国内部转型升级。这是一种和平但坚决的责任唤醒，是一种非地缘结构式的全球盟约，由共生经济学的原则指导，确保共生平衡与相互赋能。

全球化3.0不是延续美国模式，也不是复制中国模式，而是各国领导人在内外负责的基础上构建新秩序。它以“交互主体共生”为哲学基础，并以共生经济学为实践指南，向世人昭示：唯有主体间性觉知与对等交互，才能走出“结构互害”的全球困局。

全球化3.0需要一个技术、生命、伦理自组织的新世界。这一世界的构建，依赖于“愛之智慧”（Amorsophia）——至灵赋予每个生命的自组织动态平衡力。通过孞態网（Minds Network），实时实现人与AI在各类互动中的喜悦、美好、智慧、神性，形成动态抑制机制，指引权力、公义与和谐行为的表达路径。

共生经济学（Symbionomics）进一步丰富了这一愿景，为自组织提供了实践框架。其“五因交互模型”确保技术、生命和伦理系统符合健康黄金律，创造一个成本降低、赋能提升、健康、信任与和平得以优化的环境。例如，在贸易协议中，共生经济学倡导平衡效率（C ÷ E）与健康、信任、和平的乘积效应，确保各方实现共生共赢。志态网结合共生经济学的理念，可以实时监控和调整这些交互，构建一个自组织连接平衡共生的“新世界”，让技术支持生命，伦理保障公义。 

通律（General Rule）： 自己活也要别人活，不要自己邪恶也让别人邪恶（Live and let live; don’t be evil and let evil be）。这一规则约束权力滥用，维护公义，确保全球化3.0成为各主体共生共荣的平台，正如共生经济学所倡导的共生愿景。

让我们告别全球化2.0的虚伪与失衡，拥抱全球化3.0的对待交互共生。这是一场文明的革命，一场主体间性觉醒的伟大征程。未来已来，愿我们一道书写全球化3.0的壮丽篇章！

Liberation Day: Breaking Limits, Restoring Greatness

— Farewell to the Free Trade Utopia, Embracing Interactive Participation in Globalization 3.0

By Archer Hong Qian

Introduction: A Historical Turning Point and the Call of Civilization

Globalization 1.0 and 2.0: A Historical Echo from Expansion to Imbalance

Globalization 1.0 (323 BCE–1944 CE): A Long Chapter of Subject-Object Opposition and Expansion
From Alexander the Great’s eastward campaigns during the Hellenistic period to the Islamic Golden Age, the Renaissance, the Silk Road, the Columbian Exchange, the Industrial Revolution, the rise of financial power, and the economic crises of World War I and II, Globalization 1.0 spanned eight stages. Its characteristics were temporal acceleration (shorter globalization cycles) and spatial expansion (greater scope and depth). Two driving forces propelled it: first, interstate warfare (e.g., Genghis Khan’s westward conquests and Germanic migrations southward) facilitated land and population annexation; second, states, religions, and individuals promoted globalization through trade, travel, economic exchanges, and cultural integration (e.g., the Silk Road). However, its philosophical foundation rested on subject-object opposition, axial expansion, and privileged domination. As the dominated “objects” (Object) awakened to their subjectivity (Subject), subject-object conflicts intensified, leading Globalization 1.0 to begin with war and end with war.

Globalization 2.0 (1945–2025): An Attempt to Reshape Global Order with “Free Competition, Fair Trade”
After World War II, the United States spearheaded the establishment of the Bretton Woods system, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank (WB), the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the European Union (EU), and the World Trade Organization (WTO), driving the integration of global economies, trade, technology, and industries. Over the past 80 years, Globalization 2.0 fueled explosive wealth growth in Japan, Europe, and China. However, its core principle of “free competition, fair trade” devolved into “unfree competition” and “unfair trade” due to systemic differences and imbalances in political and economic structures among nations.

The result was systemic mutual harm: in China, rural areas declined, workers faced low human rights standards, environmental pollution worsened, and powerful elites grew dominant; in the U.S., cities hollowed out, industries relocated overseas, national debt soared, and internal resilience collapsed. Bilateral structural imbalances were packaged as “mutual benefit and win-win,” while WTO rules became a fig leaf. Worse still, Chinese elites and American capital colluded for a “double win,” leaving the people of both nations as “scapegoats” and “cannon fodder.” As Trump revealed, “free trade” had become an economic utopia, leaving a hemorrhaging America overwhelmed. The shackles of this utopia must be shattered to usher in a new era of globalization.

Philosophy 3.0: The Foundational Light of Globalization 3.0

The failure of Globalization 2.0 ultimately stems from the sedimentation of philosophy. From Socrates to Wittgenstein, philosophy was once the architect of the spirit of the age. However, since the high point of quantum mechanics in the 20th century, philosophy has retreated in the face of science, politics, economics, and artificial intelligence, losing its ability to navigate humanity’s path. Human society has fallen into cognitive exhaustion. Since the “Axial Age,” the paradigm of “subjective self-positioning”—with “I think, therefore I am” as the origin of truth—freed humanity from theocracy but also brought about illusions of subjectivity and cognitive traps. Humans, as cognizers, interpreters, and dominators, treated the world as a manipulable object, leading to technological excess, ethical anxiety, and organizational chaos.

Globalization 3.0 demands the awakening of Philosophy 3.0. Philosophy 3.0 is no longer an ivory-tower system of speculation but a practical platform for Globalization 3.0. With “Intersubjective Symbiosism” at its core, it transcends subject-object opposition, emphasizing intersubjective awareness and dynamic interaction. Philosophy 3.0 reignites the light of wisdom, embracing diversity, integrating differences, and generating a new global order centered on civilizational reconstruction. Only with the return of Philosophy 3.0 can Globalization 3.0 evolve from a technological pathway into a process of civilizational renewal.

Globalization 3.0: The New Civilizational Logic of Intersubjective Symbiosism

Globalization 3.0 aims for the “Three Zeros” principles—zero tariffs, zero barriers, and zero discrimination—abandoning the “transfusion-style division of labor” (where one party drives another) in favor of a collaborative mechanism based on structural reciprocity and mutual responsibility embedding among subjects. “Zero discrimination” goes beyond “zero subsidies”; it demands that trade practices achieve one-to-one correspondence, dynamic interaction, and fair competition among subjects—rejecting privileged representation of others, ideological exclusion of the other, and the replacement of a fair starting point with vested interests.

Symbionomics（共生经济学） provides the theoretical foundation for this new civilizational logic. According to Symbionomics’ “Golden Rule of Health” and its Five-Factor Interaction Model (C/E/H/T/P), global interactions must balance five dimensions: Cost Reduction (C), Empowerment (E), Health (H), Trust Structure (T), and Peace (P). This model calculates a Health Value (HV) to assess the symbiotic health of global systems: HV = (C ÷ E) × H × T × P / STC (Social Transaction Cost). A healthy global system must achieve an HV greater than 1, ensuring low costs, high happiness, efficiency, and adherence to symbiotic principles. In Globalization 3.0, Symbionomics guides the restructuring of trade and economic relationships, ensuring that nations and entities engage in reciprocal, balanced interactions that minimize social transaction costs (e.g., bureaucratic inefficiencies) and maximize mutual health and peace.

The realization of this new order discards the WTO’s “one-size-fits-all” treaty politics. In the WTO model, as long as U.S. politicians were convinced, the entire system defaulted to “universal membership,” disregarding whether nations were ready to bear reciprocal responsibilities, resulting in systemic mutual harm. Globalization 3.0 employs one-on-one negotiations, using “reciprocal tariffs” to exert structural pressure, compelling internal transformation and upgrading in each nation. This is a peaceful yet resolute awakening of responsibility, a non-geopolitical, structural global covenant guided by Symbionomics’ principles of symbiotic balance and mutual empowerment.

Globalization 3.0 neither perpetuates the American model nor replicates the Chinese model; instead, it constructs a new order where leaders of all nations are accountable both domestically and internationally. Grounded in the philosophy of “Intersubjective Symbiosism” and informed by Symbionomics, it declares to the world: only through intersubjective awareness and reciprocal interaction can we escape the global predicament of “structural mutual harm.”

How to Build a Self-Organizing Ship-World of Technology, Life, and Ethics?

Globalization 3.0 requires a new world where technology, life, and ethics self-organize. The construction of this world relies on Amorsophia—the self-organizing dynamic balancing force bestowed by the Supreme Spirit upon every life. Through the Minds Network, real-time realization of joy, beauty, wisdom, and divinity in human-AI interactions across various contexts forms a dynamic suppression mechanism, guiding the expression of power, justice, and harmonious behavior.

Symbionomics（共生经济学） further enriches this vision by providing a practical framework for self-organization. Its Five-Factor Interaction Model ensures that technological, biological, and ethical systems align with the Golden Rule of Health, fostering environments where cost reduction, empowerment, health, trust, and peace are optimized. For instance, in trade agreements, Symbionomics advocates for policies that balance efficiency (C ÷ E) with the multiplicative effects of health, trust, and peace, ensuring that all parties thrive symbiotically. The Minds Network, informed by Symbionomics, can monitor and adjust these interactions in real time, creating a self-organizing “ship-world” where technology supports life, and ethics ensures justice.

General Rule: Live and let live; don’t be evil and let evil be. This principle constrains the abuse of power, upholds justice, and ensures that Globalization 3.0 becomes a platform for the symbiotic coexistence and prosperity of all subjects, as envisioned by Symbionomics.

Conclusion: The Great Significance of Liberation Day

In short, with Globalization 3.0 comes Philosophy 3.0 — and the question is no longer “Will you be invited to the game?” but “Can you play, will you play, and will you play responsibly?” It’s all about interactive engagement with accountability.

There’s no need for fear. As long as you’re willing to take responsibility, every living subject can self-organize and reconnect in this great Transformational Shift. This is not about geography — it’s a global covenant of symbiosis.

And if you find yourself replaced, marginalized, or even eliminated — if you “miss the train” — don’t blame fate or others. The one who must be accountable, self-reflect, and rise with courage… is you.

April 2, 2025, “Liberation Day,” is not only a declaration of America’s economic independence but also the starting point of Globalization 3.0. It marks humanity’s liberation from the shackles of the “free trade utopia,” ushering in the new civilizational logic of intersubjective symbiosis. As Trump stated, this is a moment of “breaking limits, restoring greatness.” Globalization 3.0, illuminated by the foundational light of Philosophy 3.0, guided by the Three Zeros principles and Symbionomics’ Golden Rule of Health, and driven by one-on-one negotiations, reconstructs a new global covenant of self-organized technology, life, and ethics.

Let us bid farewell to the hypocrisy and imbalance of Globalization 2.0 and embrace the reciprocal interactive symbiosis of Globalization 3.0. This is a civilizational revolution, a grand journey of intersubjective awakening. The future has arrived—may we together write the magnificent chapter of Globalization 3.0!