Foreword
Human history has been fraught with wars and conflicts, bringing profound suffering to all living beings on Earth. In the Xinsi-AI era, the self-organizing and balancing capabilities of individual lives have awakened like never before, enabling the possibility of autonomous community symbiosis. As globalization accelerates and interdependence among nations deepens, there is an urgent need to establish a new international order centered on the “intersubjective symbiosis” of human rights and sovereignty. This order would render any imperial, alliance, or axis attempts to dominate the world factually impossible, paving the way for lasting peace and prosperity.
Problem Statement
I. An Unexpected Beginning
In 2014, Vladimir Putin accepted the results of the Crimean “referendum” and annexed the territory into Russia, a decision that severely undermined international law. Had Putin chosen to reject the referendum’s results, he could have occupied the moral high ground, left the issue to the Ukrainian authorities, and avoided escalation. However, his decision transformed Russia’s strategy from defensive to expansionist, exacerbating tensions with Ukraine and planting the seeds for deeper conflict.
II. Ukraine’s Unexpected Resistance
In 2022, Russian forces invaded Eastern Ukraine and Kyiv, intending to quickly seize control through a blitzkrieg. However, a “Marvel-like” hero emerged in Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who refused to flee Kyiv. Supported by Javelin anti-tank missiles obtained during Donald Trump’s first term in 2017 and widespread civilian mobilization, Ukraine mounted fierce resistance and thwarted Russia’s plans. What seemed destined for a swift Russian victory turned into a protracted and unpredictable stalemate.
III. The Core Contradiction Between Sovereignty and Human Rights
The Russia-Ukraine War not only revealed military miscalculations but also highlighted the deep contradictions in the current international order: How can we reconcile the principle of “the inviolability of sovereign rights” with “high-threshold national self-determination”?
- The industrial-era international order, based on the “equal subject” logic of sovereignty and human rights, is inadequate to address the challenges of a diverse, globalized world.
- It is essential to elevate this framework to the Xinsi-AI era’s paradigm of “intersubjective symbiosis” to overcome these challenges.
Defining Two Core Principles
IV. The Premise of Sovereignty
The protection and maintenance of human rights within a defined region is the fundamental premise of sovereignty.
V. High-Threshold Human Rights and Self-Determination
In cases of severe humanitarian crises, irreconcilable cultural or ethnic conflicts, or escalations to violence within one or more sovereign states, citizen or national self-determination may be exercised to establish a new independent state. However, such a state must not join any neighboring nation to avoid new geopolitical tensions.
Goals
VI. End Ongoing Wars and Conflicts
Achieve peaceful resolutions to current international conflicts, particularly the Russia-Ukraine War, to prevent further human suffering and destruction.
VII. Rebuild a New Global Peace Order
Establish a framework for international relations based on the philosophy of intersubjective symbiosis, fostering peaceful coexistence and cooperative development among nations.
Strategies and Measures
VIII. Promoting Ceasefire and Negotiations
Under the auspices of international organizations, facilitate an immediate ceasefire among conflicting parties and initiate peace talks to lay the groundwork for a resolution.
IX. Implementing the “Third Path” Proposal
1. Withdrawal of Russian Forces
- Complete Withdrawal: Russian forces must fully withdraw from all Ukrainian territories recognized by the 1991 international borders, including Crimea and the Donbas region.
- Humanitarian Return: Return all abducted Ukrainian children and cease threats to civilians.
- Security Guarantees: Ukrainian forces and international organizations will ensure the safe withdrawal of Russian troops to prevent renewed conflict.
2. High-Threshold Independence and Neutral Buffer Zones
- Referenda in Disputed Regions: Residents of Crimea and Eastern Ukraine will decide their future through democratic referenda supervised by a joint body of the UN Trusteeship Council and the Human Rights Council. Options include:
- Remaining part of Ukraine with high autonomy.
- Establishing a new sovereign state while maintaining neutrality.
- Gaining special status (e.g., as a UN trust territory).
- 50-Year Non-Accession Rule: Newly independent states must not join any neighboring sovereign states for 50 years (e.g., Kosovo cannot join Albania, Crimea cannot join Russia).
3. Adjustment of Kaliningrad Oblast
- Creation of a New State: As a balancing measure, allow Russia’s Kaliningrad Oblast to hold a referendum to become a neutral state, such as the “Republic of Königsberg,” under international (European) supervision.
4. Concessions from the International Community
- Waiver of War Crimes Prosecution: Waive war crimes charges against Russian leaders in exchange for full compliance with the peace process.
- Unfreezing Foreign Reserves: Lift the freeze on Russia’s foreign reserves to support its economic recovery and social development.
X. Establishing International Oversight and Guarantee Mechanisms
- Reactivating the Trusteeship Council: Revitalize the UN Trusteeship Council and merge it with the Human Rights Council to oversee referenda and the governance of neutral buffer zones, evolving into the Global Symbiosis Council (UN Global Symbiosis Council).
- Technological Transparency: Use AI and blockchain technology to ensure transparency and fairness in oversight and implementation, preventing corruption and bias.
XI. Promoting the “Small is Beautiful” Model
- Learning from Success: Draw from the successes of Switzerland, Belgium, and Singapore to encourage the establishment of small, neutral states in multicultural regions, stabilizing regional dynamics and fostering economic growth.
XII. Formulating a “Global Symbiosis Charter”
- Philosophical Foundation: Develop an international charter rooted in intersubjective symbiosis, delineating the rights and responsibilities of nations, communities, and individuals.
- Institutional Safeguards: Use the charter to provide a sustainable legal framework for peace and cooperation.
Expected Outcomes
Conclusion
The core of Ending Wars and Establishing a New Global Order of Symbiosis lies in the innovative “Third Path.” By implementing high-threshold self-determination mechanisms, establishing neutral buffer zones, and ensuring oversight through the Global Symbiosis Council, this approach balances sovereignty and human rights to achieve peace and stability. The formulation and adoption of a “Global Symbiosis Charter” further provide a framework for long-term international collaboration.
This strategy not only offers a peaceful resolution to the Russia-Ukraine War but also renders any imperial or hegemonic aspirations factually impossible, marking a new chapter in humanity’s journey toward peace and symbiosis.
您好！请登录
已有0评论
购物盒子