The Global Focus Will Shift from the Russia-Ukraine War to the Middle East, and Then to the Indo-Pacific
By Archer Hong Qian
1. Trump-Putin Call (March 18) and the First Step Toward Ceasefire
On March 18, U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin discussed the 30-day ceasefire agreement reached between the U.S. and Ukraine in Jeddah. Although Putin did not fully support the ceasefire, he agreed to three initial steps:
✅ Pause attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure for 30 days.
✅ Exchange 175 prisoners of war between Russia and Ukraine.
✅ Stop attacks on Black Sea transportation routes.
While these measures mark a limited breakthrough, full military de-escalation remains uncertain.
2. The Middle East Becomes the New Global Focus
Major events on March 17 could shift the world’s attention from Ukraine to the Middle East:
🚨 Israel resumed full-scale military operations against Hamas and assassinated Hamas’ newly appointed prime minister.
🚨 The U.S. launched its third wave of military strikes against the Houthis in Yemen.
🚨 The U.S. Navy sank Iran’s intelligence flagship, the largest supporter of the Houthis.
These actions indicate that Washington’s focus on the Middle East is rapidly escalating, with direct military confrontations intensifying between the U.S., Israel, Iran, and their proxies.
3. Did the U.S. Implicitly Reach an Understanding with Russia on Iran?
During the Trump-Putin call, both leaders agreed that “Iran must never be allowed to threaten Israel’s existence.”
Although this statement does not explicitly imply a “U.S.-Russia anti-Iran coalition”, it strongly suggests:
✔ The U.S. is prepared for direct military action against Iran if necessary.
✔ Despite its historical ties with Iran, Russia will not interfere or retaliate against U.S. military actions targeting Iranian forces.
✔ Trump’s foreign policy strategy may prioritize containing Iran over escalating conflicts with Russia.
This could mark a significant geopolitical shift—the Russia-Ukraine conflict will no longer be the world’s primary concern, as the focus turns to an increasingly severe Middle East crisis.
4. Possible Outcomes: What Happens Next?
🔹 Scenario 1: The Russia-Ukraine War Becomes a Secondary Issue
- If full military ceasefire is implemented in Ukraine and multi-stage peace talks begin, global attention will gradually shift away from the war.
- As the situation develops, the Russia-Ukraine war could transition into a long-term, frozen conflict, similar to the Korean Peninsula or Kashmir dispute.
🔹 Scenario 2: The U.S. Shifts Military Focus to the Middle East
- If the Middle East conflict escalates further, the U.S. might redirect military resources and diplomatic pressure from Europe to the Gulf region.
- If Russia does not directly oppose the U.S. in the Middle East, it could use this opportunity to consolidate its position in Ukraine while global attention is elsewhere.
🔹 Scenario 3: Trump’s Foreign Policy Priorities Become Clearer
- If the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire holds, Trump’s main foreign policy focus will likely shift to the Indo-Pacific, where the Taiwan Strait, South China Sea, and regional power struggles will become the next major geopolitical theater.
- Trump’s goal of reducing U.S. military overreach and refocusing on economic competition with China would take precedence.
- The “Third Path” strategy for resolving the Russia-Ukraine war could become a model for diplomatic resolutions elsewhere, setting a precedent for resolving conflicts in other regions.
5. Conclusion: A New Global Geopolitical Landscape?
✔ The Middle East crisis could soon overshadow the Russia-Ukraine war in terms of global media attention and strategic importance.
✔ If the Russia-Ukraine military ceasefire succeeds, Trump may shift his strategy to a dual approach:
1️⃣ Managing the Middle East crisis (Israel-Iran conflict, U.S. presence in the Gulf).
2️⃣ Addressing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific (Taiwan, South China Sea, East China Sea).
✔ A Trump-Putin tacit understanding on Iran could lead to a temporary easing of tensions in Eastern Europe, while Washington’s military attention pivots to new theaters of conflict.
I have said before that the world has entered the historic moment of Globalization 3.0. This transformation is not only about changes in U.S. domestic policy, but even more so about reshaping the international political and economic order of Globalization 2.0.
The Russia-Ukraine war was an accident—a serious accident. Likewise, Trump’s 2020 election defeat was also an accident. These events allowed Putin, whose mindset remains in the era of Globalization 1.0 (which he perceives as “Russification”), to make a fateful decision that plunged Russia into a hellish war.
With Trump’s return, he is bound to continue this historic transformation (Transformation). This Transformation requires the world to adapt to intersubjective symbiosis thinking.
After 60 days of joyful celebration mixed with complaints, the pace of transformation may slow down slightly in the coming months, but it will also be a critical period—if the Russia-Ukraine ceasefire holds, we may witness a major shift in the international political landscape by 2025!
March 19, 2025 — Vancouver
《大格局、大使命、大智慧——写于Trump当选第47任美国总统当日》
美国“非法移民”问题的背后,是这世界上还存在人民无法安居乐业发挥生命自组织力与外连接力的攫取型野蛮之地——在那些冒充国家政府的准国家政府、那些冒充政党政治的黑帮团伙的压迫剥削下,要么逼上梁山,要么背井离乡!
这道理很简单,设若解决了这种根源性问题,人们在其本土生活得自由自在,谁愿意成群结队离开自己的故土?哪还有什么“走线”“非法移民”对美国的骚扰呢?诚然,野蛮之地的人民自己要组织起来反抗、纾困,这叫“内生性逻辑”,如最近孟加拉、阿根廷的和平改变。但如果特权团伙势力过大,工具(含AI)手段太过野蛮,社会流动完全固化,人民完全陷入可怜的犬儒逐利、戾气冲天而又只能躺平以对,那么,改变野蛮姿态的方式,就必须通过文明的力量,即“制度外部性法则”来强有力地推动!
这不仅是当代美国总统的使命,也是美国的最大利益所在,比如被“非法移民”,现行“单纯经济全球化”产业转移造成“铁锈带”所困!
再比如经济问题,在美国无论是川普的减税或哈里斯的增税,他们都不可能自行其是,没有参众两院表决,他们谁也不能任意命令美联储加息或减息,他们更不能任命50个州的州长,而且,美国投资界有一句谚语:“任何一个坐在白宫的人,对投资市场的影响都是微乎其微的”!
虽然,美国总统的言论也确实不能小觑,比如川普(可能深谙人们多半势利眼),他这一年多嘴上反反复复耍的小花招,就很有趣很管用,分别吓得欧洲各国加大加深援助乌克兰,吓得ROC台湾抓紧购买和自造武器武装自己,日本等国大幅提高国防支出的GDP占比,俄罗斯要胁猪队友抱团取暖,PRC当局一边刺激经济一边变调向美示好,“非法移民”开始自律,也许还能促使拜登下野前(不管谁当选),会有惊世的收官之举……所以,美国总统竞选时无论说得如何天花乱坠,也难以撼动美国经济增长的内生逻辑和路径依赖(自由市场、健全法治、社区自治、科技昌明),说白了单从本土经济效率上做文章,无论他们四年任期怎么努力,都很难有大作为。
但是,美国经济在“外生法则”上,总统只要有足够的胆识,“以外带内”是大有作为的。这可是有先例的,如威尔逊总统果断参加一战,打出了一批文明国家,世界自由市场容量一夜扩容,美国经济也迅速腾飞。小罗斯福机智而果断参与二战,又打出一大批文明国家,特别是战后对德国、日本政治经济的成功改造和扶持,使世界自由市场有更大扩容,不但美国经济迅猛腾飞,美元成为世界经济发展的杠杆和保障,而且带动了一大批邓小平说的“凡是跟美国好的国家,都富裕了”(1979年访美在飞机上答李慎之问)。
这道理也很简单,共生经济学(Symbionomics)认为,“自由市场的容量和质差的改善与地缘贸易摩擦和冲突的减少”成反比例关系,目前的强国“以外生性带动内生性”,帮助“攫取型野蛮之地”的国家和国民,转变成“互利共生型文明之地”的国家和国民,政治经济上就自然获得“降本赋能”的自生力——生命自组织力与外连接平衡力,不仅能让自身经济呈几何级增长,而且是从根本上消除“非法经济”(如毒品)和“非法移民”的出路。许多人在胡扯川普总统是“逆全球化”,其实他要的是更具体的双边、多边谈判(甚至不惜以“加关税”的方式“促谈判”,用“以战终战”的方式“谈出和平共处”)下,实行产业链、供应链、价值链趋势下的“零关税、零壁垒、零歧视”的全球化,比如他45任总统期间签署的“美加墨自由贸易协定”就是范例。
Trump在胜选感言中说了:“I’m too old to worry about who likes me and who dislikes me. I have more important things to do. If you love me, I love you. If you support me, I support you. If you hate me, I don’t care. Life goes on with or without you.”
Trump总统希望把战时乌克兰交给欧洲和乌克兰自己,把中东和平交给以色列和中东各国自己,美国将集中力量处理解决造成“非法移民”及损害经济全球化之根由——印太问题,以便示范阙立生命至上的交互主体共生(Intersubjective Symbiosism)新文明制序,确保每个国家和地区的政治经济文化事务,由其人民及其领导人自己负责任地处理(这也是MAGA的真实含义,见Trump2018年联合国讲话),从而涌现公民、社会、政府三大生命自组织力与外连接平衡力交互共生态势,创建一个人人自美其美、美人之美、美美与共、全息共生的新世界!
这样的定位明晰而堅定,再次任灯塔國總統必会大干一场!
http://symbiosism.com.cn/8893.html
2025年03月22日下午4:39