俄乌第三和平方略：五项基本原则、十一条和平框架

俄乌第三和平方略：五项基本原则、十一条和平框架

The Third Peace Strategy for Russia and Ukraine: Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace Framework

——交互主体共生视野下的地缘政治出路
— A Geopolitical Pathway under the Vision of Intersubjective Symbiosism

Archer Hong Qian

（Global Symbiosism Society）

俄乌战争三年多，形势越发错综复杂，但无论多么复杂，已经不是“谁赢谁输”的问题，而是简单到如何结束“荼毒生命，毁灭文明”的问题，否则结果必是“不共生，就共死”。

那么，导致欧洲乃至世界危机的俄乌战争如何终结？

请允许我本着基于“生命自组织连接平衡与再平衡”的交互主体共生（Intersubjective Symbiosism）哲学，重申一年前提出的解决导致欧洲危机的俄乌战争之第三方略（参看《俄乌止战/止盈的第三条思路》，刊于香港《文化中国》总第118期）。现略去战争态势分析，微调后再次发布。

从自然法的视角，人类战争是一种特殊的生态战争。

尤其是热兵器时代人类的生态战争，一旦开打，就有一种超强裹挟力，不但可能把整个人类，还会把整个地球生灵裹挟进来，且战争手段无所不用其极，非常残忍而惨烈！一旦开打，就没有人可以“叫停战争”，总是开打容易（往往是一念之间），结束难（不可收拾），而且，迄今为止，人类战争从来没有通过某个人某个机构“仲裁”终结一场战争的先例！

人类战争，尤其是现代战争的止战方式，只有五种：1、彻底胜负方式；2、打打谈谈方式；3、以打促谈方式；4、同归于尽方式；5、觉悟共生方式。

这里只说第五种方式。战争久拖不决，参战方都难以取胜，都深感“疲惫不堪”，到了各方面可承受的极限，突然发现：战争，其实一开始就非必要，而完全是某些观念作祟和误判，导致一场旷日持久的生灵涂炭，大家翻转极限，觉悟后坐下来“议和”，最典型的例子，就是三十年战争（1618－1648），议出了一个奠定此后“主权（民族）国家”世界秩序的《威斯特伐利亚和约》。

这就是“交互主体共生”哲学的最鲜明案例！

那么，我要说的是：俄乌“三年战争”的终结方式，有没有仿效觉悟共生的“议和”方式，从而结出一个“化解冲突重建世界新秩序”的历史性新成果呢？

 我想，热核+AI时代的当代人，只要当事方，有足够的愛之智慧（Aomrsophia）、勇气担当和能力，搁置卷入战争是主动/被动，直接/间接，比如在“议和”并实施基础上，最后有没有可能朝着签订一份的《全球共生公约》方向迈进呢？

 对于俄乌三年战争的终结方式，我不但不排除这“第五种方式”的可能性，而且认定，“翻转极限，觉悟共生”，是当今国际社会主流，应当且最值得努力争取的结果！

 这就是我们为什么提出直接交战的俄乌双方止战条件之外的第三方略：五项基本原则，十一条和平框架“时空意间”背景。

五项基本原则

1.乌克兰作为一个有效治理的主权独立国家，其国家地位不可动摇、不可剥夺；

2.生命安全优先于领土幻觉，人的尊严高于任何历史叙事和利益诉求；

3.“小即是美”“社区大于国家”的多元独立共生体制，是中东欧与俄罗斯缓冲区与未来世界和平的共生法则；

4.俄罗斯的“安全感”，应被纳入共生协商机制，但不得以毁灭本国人民和他国存在为代价；

5.欧美不以彻底摧毁俄罗斯，而以“技术—经济繁荣—人文共生网络”引导其脱离帝国思维，重新融入全球文明秩序。

十一条和平框架

1.实现美国总统50天内停火建议，100天内完成俄乌双方有序撤出乌东与库尔斯克地区，建立和谈平台；

2.和平谈判由乌克兰与俄罗斯主谈，欧盟、英国参与，美国主导主持；

3.乌东四州（顿涅茨克、卢甘斯克、扎波罗热、赫尔松）在全民公投、国际监督下，建立“小即是美”原则下的独立国家，脱离双方控制，采取中立政策；

4.加里宁格勒州（俄罗斯飞地）在区域公投下转型为“柯尼斯堡共和国”，不再受俄联邦直接控制；

5.克里米亚维持现状由俄罗斯托管，但国际承认其原则上为“独立待定”，由未来乌俄共商解决主权归属；

6.俄罗斯须归还在战争中掳走的所有乌克兰儿童、平民及其财物资产；

7.欧洲设立联合维和部队，由英国与欧盟共同领导，派驻至乌东四州与柯尼斯堡地区，监督其安全建国进程；

8.确立乌克兰中、西部“东仪天主教”文化与乌克兰民族传统基础，俄罗斯及国际社会承认，以基辅为首都，领土完整主权独立的“新乌克兰”共和国；

9.俄罗斯用于战争所被冻结资产一部分将以战后重建资金形式补偿新乌克兰，欧美同时取消对俄罗斯的全面经济制裁；

10.新乌克兰共和国是否加入欧盟与北约为其主权选择，俄罗斯不得干预，同时，欧盟与北约对俄罗斯开放谈判大门；

11.和平协议签署，邀请以下7国作为地缘安全共生体见证人：白俄罗斯、波兰、立陶宛、芬兰、罗马尼亚、摩尔多瓦、土耳其。

战略意义简析

1.维护乌克兰国家主体性：从起点就确认其独立主权与治理合法性，打破任何“去国化”幻想；

2.终结帝国逻辑：将领土争议转化为中立小国网络，实现历史负担的和平“孵化”与文明转译；

3.构建共生安全带：围绕俄欧之间的地理张力，建立若干中立地带作为文明缓冲器，避免俄罗斯与北约直接对撞；

4.孞態网（Minds Network）AI-TRUST基础设施：在三网融合（互联网、物联网、孞態网）生態奖抑机制等变革性技术伦理的支撑下，实现“人-AI（工具理性）-TRUST（组织）”交互主体共生，改变和平衡人类生产、生態、生活方式。短期内，亦可协助欧洲维和部队完成监督停火、透明治理、公投信任与战争创伤疗愈工作；

5.全球共生范式试验场：首次在欧陆危机中尝试以“生命—主权—共生”的三元结构替代“武力—制裁—谈判”的旧世界秩序，“让任何统治全世界的帝国政治企图都成为不可能”（康德《论永久和平》）。

2024年3月提出，2025年7月更新于温哥华

联系方式：

hongguanworld@gmail.com +1 604 690 6088

The Third Peace Strategy for Russia and Ukraine: Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace Framework

— A Geopolitical Pathway under the Vision of Intersubjective Symbiosism

By Archer Hong Qian

(Global Symbiosism Society)

More than three years into the Russia-Ukraine war, the situation has become increasingly entangled. Yet, no matter how complex it appears, the core issue is no longer about “who wins and who loses,” but rather how to end a war that devastates life and destroys civilization. Otherwise, the only possible outcome will be: no symbiosis, then mutual destruction.

So, how can this war, which has triggered a crisis in Europe and the world at large, be brought to an end?

Drawing from the philosophy of Intersubjective Symbiosism, which is grounded in the self-organizing connectivity and dynamic rebalancing of life, I hereby reaffirm a solution proposed one year ago—a Third Peace Strategy to address the war and its consequences for Europe (see “The Third Path to Ending or Profiting from the Russia-Ukraine War,” Cultural China, Issue 118, Hong Kong). This updated version skips battlefield analysis and focuses directly on the revised proposal.

A Natural Law Perspective: Human Warfare as Ecological Conflict

Especially in the era of thermal weapons, war has become a form of ecological conflict, capable of sweeping not only all of humanity, but all life on Earth into its fold. The means of destruction have become virtually unlimited—brutal and merciless.

Once war begins—often sparked by a single thought—there is no one capable of simply “calling it off.” Beginning is easy, ending is chaos. And to date, there has never been a case where a war has been arbitrated and ended by a single person or institution.

Modern warfare typically ends in one of five ways:

1. Total victory and defeat;
2. Alternating war and negotiation;
3. Using war to pressure negotiation;
4. Mutually assured destruction;
5. Awakening to symbiosis.

Our Focus: The Fifth Way — Awakening to Symbiosis

When war drags on and no side can achieve a decisive victory, and all participants feel exhausted and stretched to their limits, they may come to a sudden realization: this war, from the outset, was unnecessary, born out of entrenched ideologies and misjudgments. And so, a moment of awakening arrives. The participants turn from destruction to peace talks.

The most iconic example: the Thirty Years’ War (1618–1648), which led to the Peace of Westphalia, establishing the sovereign nation-state system that defines the modern world.

This is the most vivid historical embodiment of Intersubjective Symbiosism.

So the question becomes: Can the Russia-Ukraine war—three years long—be brought to an end through a similar process of enlightened negotiation and become a historical achievement that resolves conflict and rebuilds a new world order?

Toward a Global Symbiosism Pact

In the age of nuclear heat and AI, if the relevant parties can draw on sufficient Amorsophia (the wisdom of love), courage, responsibility, and competence—regardless of whether they were actively or passively, directly or indirectly involved—then, on the foundation of a peace agreement, is it not possible that they could one day sign a Global Symbiosism Pact?

I firmly believe not only that this fifth path is possible, but that it is the most realistic, mainstream, and worthwhile outcome that the international community should pursue.

This is why we propose, in addition to the conditions for a direct ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine, a Third Peace Strategy composed of:
Five Fundamental Principles and an Eleven-Point Peace Framework,
under a background of Spatio-Temporal Interspace (时空意间).

Five Fundamental Principles

1. Ukraine is a sovereign and effectively governed independent nation.
   Its national status is non-negotiable and cannot be revoked.
2. The safety of human life takes precedence over territorial illusions.
   Human dignity outweighs any historical narratives or interest claims.
3. A pluralistic and symbiotic system of “small is beautiful” independent states
   is the guiding law for peace in the buffer zone between Central/Eastern Europe and Russia.
4. Russia’s sense of security must be addressed within a symbiotic consultation mechanism,
   but must never come at the cost of destroying its own people or the existence of other nations.
5. Western countries must not aim to destroy Russia completely,
   but rather guide it out of imperial thinking through a network of technological, economic, and humanistic symbiosis,
   allowing it to rejoin the global civilizational order.

Eleven-Point Peace Framework

1. Implement the U.S. President’s proposal for a ceasefire within 50 days,
   and complete the orderly withdrawal of both sides from eastern Ukraine and the Kursk region within 100 days,
   with a peace negotiation platform established.
2. Peace talks will be primarily conducted between Ukraine and Russia,
   with the European Union and the United Kingdom participating, and the United States leading and hosting.
3. The four eastern Ukrainian regions (Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson)
   will, under international supervision and public referendums, become independent neutral states based on the “small is beautiful” principle,
   free from control by either Ukraine or Russia.
4. Kaliningrad (Russian exclave) will, through a regional referendum,
   be transformed into the Republic of Königsberg, no longer directly governed by the Russian Federation.
5. Crimea will remain under Russian trusteeship,
   but will be internationally recognized as “independently undetermined”,
   with its final sovereign status to be negotiated jointly by Ukraine and Russia in the future.
6. Russia must return all Ukrainian children, civilians, and private property abducted during the war.
7. A European peacekeeping force, jointly led by the UK and the EU,
   will be stationed in the four eastern regions and Königsberg to oversee their peaceful nation-building processes.
8. The cultural foundation of “Eastern Rite Catholicism” and Ukrainian national identity
   in central and western Ukraine shall be affirmed,
   and both Russia and the international community shall recognize the new sovereign, territorially complete Republic of New Ukraine, with Kyiv as its capital.
9. A portion of Russia’s frozen wartime assets shall be used as reconstruction funds for New Ukraine,
   while the West concurrently lifts comprehensive economic sanctions on Russia.
10. Whether New Ukraine joins the EU or NATO is its sovereign choice;
    Russia shall not interfere. At the same time, EU and NATO must open dialogue with Russia for potential cooperation.
11. Upon signing the peace agreement, seven countries shall be invited to serve as witnesses and symbiotic security guarantors:
    Belarus, Poland, Lithuania, Finland, Romania, Moldova, and Turkey.

Strategic Significance Overview

• Affirms Ukraine’s national sovereignty from the outset,
  dispelling any illusions of “denationalization.”
• Ends imperial logic by transforming territorial disputes
  into a network of neutral microstates, thereby “incubating peace” and translating historical burdens into civilizational transitions.
• Builds a symbiotic security buffer zone between Russia and Europe,
  avoiding direct confrontation between NATO and Russia through a chain of neutral states.
• Minds Network (孞態网) AI-TRUST Infrastructure: Supported by the integration of three networks—Internet, Internet of Things (IoT), and the Minds Network—along with transformative techno-ethical reward–restraint mechanisms, this infrastructure enables intersubjective symbiosis among Humans, AI (instrumental reason), and TRUST (organizations), thereby reshaping and rebalancing modes of human production, ecology, and lifestyle. In the short term, it can also assist European peacekeeping forces in ceasefire monitoring, transparent governance, referendum trust-building, and trauma healing.

In the short term, this infrastructure can assist peacekeeping forces in overseeing ceasefires, transparent governance, referendum credibility, and trauma healing.

• A global pilot for the symbiosis paradigm:
  For the first time in European crisis history, this framework replaces the old global order of Force – Sanctions – Negotiation
  with a triadic structure of Life – Sovereignty – Symbiosis,
  echoing Kant’s vision in Perpetual Peace to “make any attempt at world domination by empire politically impossible.”

Proposed: March 2024
Updated: July 2025 in Vancouver

Contact:
📧 hongguanworld@gmail.com
📞 +1 604 690 6088